Last Sunday Pope Francis revealed what he expects from parishes around the world. Every local Catholic community, he said, must make evangelising the poor a priority. Reflecting on the day’s Gospel reading (Luke 4:14-21), in which Jesus discloses his own mission, he said Christ is determined to reach those “who are farthest away, the suffering, the sick, those who are discarded by society”.
Each new generation is called to take up Jesus’s mission to the neglected. “It means being close to them,” Francis said, “having the joy of serving them, freeing them from oppression, and all this in the name of and with the Spirit of Christ, because [Jesus] is the Gospel of God, He is the Mercy of God, He is the liberation of God.” The Pope then asked pointedly: “Are we being faithful to Christ’s programme?”
Many parishes could answer that question with a resounding yes. They run soup kitchens, shelters for the homeless or food banks. They visit the elderly and comfort the sick. But Pope Francis wants us to ask: could we be doing more? That is a crucial question and one we could easily evade by shifting attention to the Pope’s more eye-catching gestures and pronouncements. But this, in the end, is how Francis is likely to be remembered: for his energetic attempt to make Catholicism synonymous with service of the poor.
We say “attempt” because so far, almost three years into this pontificate, his total commitment to the poor is more admired than imitated. Why are we so quick to applaud his virtue and so reluctant to acquire it? Perhaps because we are convinced that Francis is the spiritual equivalent of an Olympic athlete, while we are just plodders who could never hope to keep up with him. No doubt Francis would be the first to say this is a delusion. After all, he teaches that service of the poor is the calling of all Catholics, not simply the vocation of an elite.
Would a renewed commitment to the needy turn the Church into a mere charity? Not at all. Francis has been clear from the first days of his pontificate that the Church must never resemble an NGO, attending to the poor’s material needs while overlooking their spiritual ones. The mission to the poor, he said on Sunday, is not rooted in an ideology, but in a recognition of “the strength of the Gospel of God, who converts hearts, heals the wounded, transforms human and social relationships according to the logic of love”.
Francis clearly believes that society will only be renewed through service of the poor. He wants Catholics to be the catalysts of massive social change – rather than reluctant witnesses to it, as we so often are.
Catholics of all stripes should be able to rally round this vision. Outsiders often associate care for the poor with liberal Catholicism. But the truth is more complex: there are traditionalist parishes that take service of the poor every bit as seriously as the liturgy.
In any case, the superficial distinctions between Catholics fall away when we are standing side by side in soup kitchens or bringing Holy Communion to the housebound together. There is no better way of strengthening Catholic unity – and renewing society – than by adopting out what Francis calls “Christ’s programme”.
Let the voters decide on Europe
There is a certain strand of Evangelical Christianity that has long seen the European Union as a Catholic conspiracy. This was the view of the Rev Ian Paisley, who famously heckled John Paul II when he addressed the parliament in Strasbourg and called the EU “the greatest Catholic superstate the world has ever known”.
The European Economic Community, as it was originally known, began with the Treaty of Rome in 1957 and since then has grown from six to 28 members. Along the way it has also grown in depth, from a loose trading coalition to a “union”
of states.
And yet when Britain joined on January 1, 1973, its people were told they were joining a common market. The idea of pooling sovereignty has remained a deeply contentious issue on this island. The topic will come to a head in the next few months as the British people vote on whether to continue on the road to European Union or to take their chances elsewhere. Catholics are expected to be as split on the matter as the rest of their compatriots.
There are many issues in play here, not least what effect the decision will have on our economy. There are also the interconnected topics of immigration and security, especially important as the faithful here have strong links to Ireland and Poland. Christians will also be asking themselves whether Brussels is truly on their side when it comes to religious freedom.
It’s vital that the Church does not appear to be directing Catholics how to vote in the referendum. Last week’s remarks by the Vatican’s “foreign minister” Archbishop Paul Gallagher, that Britain is “better in than out” of the EU, were imprudent. Of course, the Church has a duty to set out the general principles it believes are at stake in the vote. But it should do no more than that.
Areas of Catholic Herald business are still recovering post-pandemic.
However, we are reaching out to the Catholic community and readership, that has been so loyal to the Catholic Herald. Please join us on our 135 year mission by supporting us.
We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching.
We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values. Please consider donating.