The war in Syria is by no means over, but it rather carrying on under the radar of the usual barrage of news stories we prefer to read about. In the last week or so, the Assad regime is dealing with the last remaining rebel enclave near Damascus, Eastern Ghouta. This enclave has a population of over 300,000 people, and is slowly being reduced by starvation and indiscriminate bombing.
These were the same methods used to reduce other rebel-held territories such as Eastern Aleppo. The outlook for people in Eastern Ghouta does not look good. But even though Mr Assad may win the war in Eastern Ghouta, it is unlikely that he will ever be able to reassert full control over the whole of Syria, given the fact that his army, even with his foreign allies, is simply not big enough to do so.
The truth is that Mr Assad is still in power thanks to two things. The first is the failure of the West to intervene decisively against him (a failure in which even the Vatican played a part.) The second thing that has helped him is the military assistance from Russia, Hizbollah and Iran. If these allies were to desert him, he would not last long.
At the close of last year, Iran seemed to be on the brink of revolution, a real revolution which would have undone the one that overthrew the Shah. The widespread protests, which now seem to have stopped, were sparked by economic discontents and the rise in the cost of basic foodstuffs, a familiar phenomenon in the history of revolutions. The people were also protesting about the way the regime was spending lots of money propping up Assad, and interfering in Yemen and Lebanon, while not looking after its own people.
If (and it is a huge if) these protests start again (and the basic discontents have not gone away), and if there is regime change in Tehran, then the client government in Damascus would be doomed. If that were to bring peace to Syria would remain to be seen; but it would certainly mean a huge change to the war in Syria. It is not too much to imagine that the road to peace in Syria goes through Tehran. If Assad were to fall, it would also have serious repercussions for Mr Putin, his other champion, and that in turn would perhaps grant a respite in eastern Ukraine.
An awful lot depends on what happens in Tehran. Iran’s archenemy, Saudi Arabia, must be watching the situation there with great interest. For if Iran were to be once more what it was before the Islamic Revolution – a country friendly to the West – the West would no longer need Saudi Arabia as its ally against Iran.
Meanwhile, the people of Eastern Ghouta continue to suffer under the barrel bombs of the regime, and besieged by land and air forces from Lebanon and Iran, and possibly Russia. They are victims of a global power play of which most of them know nothing. The inability of the world to do anything about this is shocking.
Having been unable to sell in churches for well over a year due to the pandemic, we are now inviting readers to support the Herald by investing in our future. We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values.
Please join us on our 130 year mission by supporting us. We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching. For more information from our chairman on contributing to the Herald Patron's Fund, click here
Make a Donation
Donors giving £500 or more will automatically become sponsor patrons of the Herald. This includes two complimentary print/digital gift subscriptions, invitations to Patron events, pilgrimages and dinners, and 6 gift subscriptions sent to priests, seminaries, Catholic schools, religious care homes and prison and university chaplaincies. Click here for more information on becoming a Patron Sponsor. Click here for more information about contributing to the Herald Patron's Fund