Government departments must consider the impact of their policies on the family, the Prime Minister announced on Monday. In his speech David Cameron said that from October every new domestic policy “will be examined for its impact on the family”.
The Prime Minister unveiled several policy initiatives relevant to families including the doubling of the budget for relationship counselling through Relate to £19.5 million, an increase in funding for councils who want to speed up adoptions and the expansion of a programme of assistance for “problem families” who struggle with unemployment and debt. He also suggested that online music videos on sites such as YouTube and Vimeo could be given age ratings in the same way as films and DVDs.
“I want every government department to be held to account for the impact of their policies on the family,” he said.
“Whether it’s the benefits system incentivising couples to live apart or penalising those who go out to work or whether it’s excessive bureaucracy preventing loving couples from adopting children with no family at all, we can’t go on having government taking decisions like this which ignore the impact on the family. Put simply that means every single domestic policy that government comes up with will be examined for its impact on the family.”
The Prime Minister’s words echoed those of Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor 10 years ago at a parliamentary briefing organised by Caritas Social Action Network (CSAN). The former Archbishop of Westminster said: “Building strong families is a sensible and cost-effective goal of Government social policy.”
The Prime Minister’s words have been welcomed on behalf of the Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales. Elizabeth Davies, Marriage and Family Life Project Officer, said: “We certainly welcome David Cameron’s announcement that all policies should be weighed against the potential for good – and not so good – that they might have on families. Obviously families have many different needs depending on their size, structure, stage of life etc. but fundamental is the need to be able to earn a satisfying living, whilst also having enough time to rest, relax and enjoy time together.”
She continued: “The working document for the forthcoming Synod on the Family has noted the impact of work on the family, especially that ‘an increasingly hectic life leaves little opportunity for moments of peace and family togetherness’. It is critical that Government seeks ways to alleviate the pressures of balancing our work-home-life responsibilities. Families play a fundamental role in church and society and deserve grateful, appreciative encouragement and a family-sensitive political economy.”
But a spokesman for the campaigning group the Marriage Foundation, while welcoming Mr Cameron’s support for the family, warned that without explicit support for marriage his initiatives will have little or no impact on family breakdown.
“Actions speak louder than words,” said research director Harry Benson. “Coalition policies during their first four years in government would struggle to pass a ‘family test’. We have a tax credit system that pays couples up to £7,100 more to live apart than together, a tax system that penalises single earners who choose to leave one parent at home, and a raft of government forms that pretend living together is the equal of marriage. In terms of stability, it is anything but.”
He continued: “Family breakdown is not inevitable. But so much is driven by the trend away from marriage. Few couples who don’t marry, who don’t make that explicit commitment to their future together, remain together while they bring up their children. Mr Cameron has long stated his enthusiasm for commitment and marriage. He is right. So ‘family test’ needs to mean ‘marriage test’.”
The Catholic Herald comment guidelines At The Catholic Herald we want our articles to provoke spirited and lively debate. We also want to ensure the discussions hosted on our website are carried out in civil terms. All commenters are therefore politely asked to ensure that their posts respond directly to points raised in the particular article or by fellow contributors, and that all responses are respectful. We implement a strict moderation policy and reserve the right to delete comments that we believe contravene our guidelines. Here are a few key things to bear in mind when commenting…
•Do not make personal attacks on writers or fellow commenters – respond only to their arguments. •Comments that are deemed offensive, aggressive or off topic will be deleted. •Unsubstantiated claims and accusations about individuals or organisations will be deleted. •Keep comments concise. Comments of great length may be deleted. •We try to vet every comment, however if you would like to alert us to a particular posting please use the ‘Report’ button. Thank you for your co-operation, The Catholic Herald editorial team
Having been unable to sell in churches for well over a year due to the pandemic, we are now inviting readers to support the Herald by investing in our future. We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values.
Please join us on our 130 year mission by supporting us. We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching. For more information from our chairman on contributing to the Herald Patron's Fund, click here
Make a Donation
Donors giving £500 or more will automatically become sponsor patrons of the Herald. This includes two complimentary print/digital gift subscriptions, invitations to Patron events, pilgrimages and dinners, and 6 gift subscriptions sent to priests, seminaries, Catholic schools, religious care homes and prison and university chaplaincies. Click here for more information on becoming a Patron Sponsor. Click here for more information about contributing to the Herald Patron's Fund