Christine Pulfrey remembers her mother as “very fit” and “in good form” when she was admitted to a private hospital in Hull for a routine knee operation. Complications arose after surgery, however, and the 86-year-old was transferred to the Royal Hull Infirmary where, according to her daughter, in February 2017 she was “deliberately deprived of hydration and food and was neglected”.
“When she died she looked as if she had been starved, like people who were starved in the concentration camps,” said Christine.
This anecdote is from one of 17 case studies included a report called When End of Life Care Goes Wrong, which will be published tomorrow by the Lords and Commons and Family and Child Protection Group in response to a growing number of complaints made by bereaved relatives to Voice for Justice UK, a campaign group.
All of the studies, drawn from a total of more than 600, which are described by the group as “the tip of the iceberg”, make deeply disturbing reading.
They also include, for instance, the case of a man called John, a non-terminal lung cancer sufferer who went to the Countess of Chester Hospital where he was injected with both morphine and midazolam, a lethal combination in a patient like him.
This injection, in the view of Sam Ahmedzai, the emeritus Professor of Palliative Medicine who offers medical analysis for each case study, was “directly responsible for the cessation of breathing” some 30 seconds later. He concluded that the family “were made to witness what they could only interpret as an act of involuntary euthanasia”.
The family called in their lawyers, intent on bringing about the prosecution of medics who might have killed John by a combination of drugs they knew to be lethal. According to the report, their efforts were thwarted by the appearance of medical documentation they say was fabricated but which was taken at face value by the police.
Another case concerned Laura Jane Booth, 21, who since birth suffered learning disabilities arising from Patau syndrome and Crohn’s disease. Her birth conditions made communication possible only through limited sign language, yet her family knew her as “kind and caring” and someone who “loved life”.
Laura was admitted to the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield for a routine eye operation and died there three weeks later.
The NHS issued a death certificate attributing Laura’s demise to her conditions combined with pneumonia and respiratory failure from fluid on the lungs. Her family were convinced she was starved to death and fought for an inquest. They had to wait four-and-a-half years to get their day in court but the coroner issued a new death certificate which listed untreated “malnutrition” among the causes.
James Bogle, a barrister and co-author of the report, identifies this case as one of a number “where proceedings for alleged homicide may have been indicated”.
Fat chance of that. As a journalist who spent years researching and writing about the Liverpool Care Pathway, the end-of-life care protocol scrapped in 2014 as a “national disgrace”, I would consider it a minor miracle if the police ever took such complaints seriously. My debut novel, The Beast of Bethulia Park (https://amzn.eu/d/i9rllc1), published shortly before Christmas, was written partly with the purpose of demonstrating how unscrupulous doctors and nurses could use such “death pathways” to kill elderly and “nuisance” patients more or less with impunity, if they chose, or indeed, were encouraged, to do so.
The evils about which I had heard so many families complain over the last decade were practised by two villainous characters and other manifestations of the problem, which appear in this report, are there too: falsified death certificates, fabricated or omitted medical documents, police officers unwilling or unable to investigate allegations from families, a system which callously places obstacles in the way of aggrieved relatives seeking the truth, which short-circuits their complaints or takes years to resolve them and to scant satisfaction, and which treats the bereaved, the anxious and the heartbroken as contemptuously as criminals. Common mechanisms for killing are set out: contrived prognoses of death followed by the withdrawal of food and fluid and the simultaneous use off a sedating “chemical cosh”, or ruses like the deliberate use of contra-indicated drugs in patients susceptible to their lethal side effects. They appear in this report as well.
What is shocking and new about the report is that all but two of the case studies have occurred since the abolition of the LCP following the review led by Baroness Neuberger the previous year. Eleven of the patient deaths described came after new guidelines were issued in 2015 by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and four of them were within the last three years.
This would suggest that the problems that the demise of LCP was supposed to have remedied are continuing, that the protocol was damaged but far from dead, and that patients have been duped into believing they are safe.
The Rev. Lynda Rose, a former barrister and the executive editor of the report, said the work of the parliamentary group showed “all too clearly that misdiagnoses and mis-assessments as to quality of life and proximity to dying are disturbingly common”.
“Excessive and inappropriate use of midazolam and morphine, rendering a patient comatose, coupled with the withdrawal of food and hydration, have combined to impose a death sentence on the elderly and vulnerable from which there is no right of appeal,” she said. “For all our sakes we need to end the abuse now.”
The group is recommending a national inventory of local end of life care plans, policies and procedures currently being used in all healthcare settings; a national rapid response service to advise and support people who have a loved one experiencing poor quality end-of-life care; a fast track advice helpline for bereaved families; a national register of cases where end-of-life care has fallen below standards or breached guidelines; the urgent adoption of a uniform national system to capture patients” preferences for end-of-life care, and further high quality research into social, medical and nursing aspects of end-of-life care.
Professor Patrick Pullicino, a recently retired consultant neurologist who was among the senior physicians to blow the whistle on LCP abuses more than a decade ago, believes that more must be done, however.
“The report flags up shortcomings of the Care Quality Commission repeatedly,” he said. “This is the body that is tasked with the safety of patients in NHS. The CQC must bear full responsibility for the continued use of lethal pathways.
“They need to make dehydration a notifiable occurrence and sanction hospitals that dehydrate patients. The one body that could force a change and stop inappropriate deaths is doing nothing despite repeated complaints made to it.”
He added: “The sick elderly necessarily take up a lot of hospital beds and therefore consume a lot of resources. Despite the increase in the elderly the number of hospital beds in the UK has dramatically fallen. It is impossible to avoid the connection with the widespread use of end of life pathways.”
Pullicino puts his finger on the nub of problem. The real dangers of such pathways lies not inherently in the systems, the level of expertise of those who deploy them, or the extent of communication between families and medical professionals.
They lie first and foremost in fallen human nature. Is it so really so difficult to accept that the “key workers” of our glorious NHS are not always motivated by the best of intentions? Any system of care must not only be conceived, operated and regulated to the highest standards but sufficiently robust and transparent to withstand the designs of those who would kill from pleasure or from conviction, and from those who would permit and encourage such killings for gain and for profit. Such people will always be around.
The NHS needs to be effectively policed. The law exists, after all, to protect the innocent and to punish the perpetrator. Yet this new report would suggest that in some areas of health care it is barely present at all. That is not only a scandal, it’s a danger to everyone.
(The Beast of Bethulia Park is out now from Gracewing or click here to order your copy).
(Photo by Simon Caldwell/ article reproduced courtesy of TCW Defending freedom)
This page is available to subscribers. Click here to sign in or get access.
Areas of Catholic Herald business are still recovering post-pandemic.
However, we are reaching out to the Catholic community and readership, that has been so loyal to the Catholic Herald. Please join us on our 135 year mission by supporting us.
We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching.
We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values. Please consider donating.